Sitting on
the sofa on Sunday last week, I came across a picture of Morrisons' baguette
projected on to the Angel of the North.
My girlfriend
shook her head in resigned disgust, muttering it was the “end of days” and
“nothing is sacred”.
I sympathise.
But I’m also from a profession where these ideas are thought up, sold to
clients, and every so often actually happen.
Outwardly
despairing, but secretly intrigued, I read the Guardian’s story to find out more.
Writer, Mark
Tran, said: "When Antony Gormley devised
one of the most recognisable pieces of public art in the land – the Angel of
the North – he wanted to create a work that would serve as a connection between
our industrial past and the future of the information age. He had not
anticipated that someone would try to use it to flog bread."
With my
girlfriend’s eyes burning into my head, I tried to disguise my snigger.
But, this is
where it gets confusing. When I looked for the cheeky Morrisons’ quote plugging
its cheaper bread, all I found was: “Morrisons did not respond to requests for
comment.”
That’s
strange. Surely that was the point?
In later
media stories, this changed to: “A Morrisons spokesperson said: 'We’re sorry if
people thought we got carried away by shining a baguette on the Angel of the
North and apologise unreservedly to those to whom we have caused offence.”'
Behind the scenes
By the
reaction in the press, I imagine that panic was breaking out in Morrisons' press office as they realised that they had offended people, maybe even some of
their customers.
But surely
Morrisons could foresee this? And surely that was part of the reason it did it?
In every
story I’ve read, it’s referenced the supermarket taking on Aldi and Lidl
through cutting prices on every day items.
Grace Dent in
the Independent explains it best: “The ad has influenced berks like me to write about it,
name-checking the supermarket while drawing attention to the fact that while
Gormley's angel bestows her silent blessing over the North-East, meanwhile
Morrisons is giving us, this day, our daily bread, and at a price more
saintlier than Lidl.”
This was the
story Morrisons was trying to tell. And to tell this story, it’s created
something that’s controversial, humorous and shareable.
This approach
doesn’t work for all brands, and perhaps not Morrisons. But the complete
surprise and sudden back tracking can only have made things worse.
So what are we to glean from this?
·
Morrisons
was probably the wrong brand for this idea. Clearly its culture and identity
isn’t prepared to play on the controversy and humour tied to a stunt like this. At least not yet. I could imagine a PaddyPower or even a Greggs carrying it off far more authentically.
·
There
are always two points of view. While Morrisons apologised, plenty of people
were seeing the funny side of it (see Mail Online comments, for example). The stunt captured people’s imaginations and
made them react, which in my opinion, is far better than boring people. The critics
are often the ones that shout the loudest. But it doesn’t mean they represent
everyone’s views. Morrisons might have reacted differently if it spent more
time considering this.
·
Morrisons' reaction was timid. I hate to see “spokesperson said”, as comes across as
nervous and unapproachable. Morrisons’ marketing or PR Director should have
come out and talked honestly about the campaign, why they did it and saying
sorry for causing offence if it was absolutely necessary.
·
And
it should have been prepared beforehand to defend its decision, so that its reasoning
fitted with the stunt. For instance, could it have played on the cutting prices
narrative? i.e. - “We’re cutting on advertising to pass on the savings”. Or
could it have done something that showed its northern roots and its connection
to the Angel?
Part of me does share the ‘nothing is
sacred’ view. But it’s worth remembering that not many people (apart from the
Police) complained when some local Newcastle fans dressed the Angel in Alan
Shearer’s number 9 shirt.
No comments:
Post a Comment